ADD TO PC
BUILD

Seneca PRO444438

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Seneca PRO444438 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK B85M-E
Memory	9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Aug 08 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4130-$41 49,509 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 95.8 2-Core 147 67% 110 Pts	4-Core 273 8-Core 270 36% 271 Pts	64-Core 272 17% 272 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 63%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz) 64,721 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 8534) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	3.7% Terrible	Lighting 3.63 Reflection 5.58 Parallax 4.72 3% 4.64 fps	MRender 7.62 Gravity 2.47 Splatting 8.13 5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.7% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 423GB free (System drive) Firmware: 19.01H19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 80 95 90 106 106 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 93.7 Write 114 Mixed 32.6 SusWrite 93.3 60% 83.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 32GB 23,482 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 20GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.1 2.1 4.2 3.4 3.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.49% Terrible	Read 27.7 Write 2.5 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 3.8 11% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 2 104% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.49% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1324 F6456U64F1600G 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1324 F6456U64F1600G 12GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.5% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 17.3 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback