Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte A320M-DS2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190321
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 16:36
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 1200-$100
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 66.6
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 190
65% 117 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 359
50% 368 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85FF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 431.60
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.6% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 37.8
32% 36 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 38.5
Splatting 36.5
31% 37.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 37 60 63 66 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 382
Write 25.7
Mixed 104
SusWrite 55.4
30% 142 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 10.6
49% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 53%
WD WD81PURZ-85LWMY0 8TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 203 200 204 206 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 192
Mixed 100
SusWrite 204
127% 174 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.8
282% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 116%
Great: 116%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
795GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 169 169 170 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 166
Mixed 109
SusWrite 168
117% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.9% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-DS2-CF Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-DS2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $187
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback