Today's hottest deals

AZW Gemini J45

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAZW Gemini J45  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190315
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 00:50
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium J4205
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
30% Below average
Memory 32.7
1-Core 47
2-Core 93
32% 57.6 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 166
21% 161 Pts
64-Core 154
10% 154 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4974
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 2.63
Reflection 2.65
Parallax 1.72
2% 2.34 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 2.43
Splatting 4.83
3% 3.44 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0327A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 34 37 34 30 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 402
Write 314
Mixed 40
SusWrite 55.1
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 14.9
39% 12.4 MB/s
DQ Read 123
DQ Write 33.7
DQ Mixed 0.3
20% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 79%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
465GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 330 345 301 345 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 350
Write 332
Mixed 291
SusWrite 332
74% 326 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 31.5
104% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 184
145% 200 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
25.9% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.4
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 2.9
9% 3.23 GB/s
Latency 239
17% 239 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Gemini J45 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AZW Gemini J45

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback