HP Mini 110-3100

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.94%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemHP Mini 110-3100  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 148A
Memory0.1 GB free of 1 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100817
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 24 '16 at 00:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 64%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom N455
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.94% Terrible
Memory 16.7
1-Core 4.4
2-Core 4.9
7% 8.67 Pts
4-Core 7.3
8-Core 9.6
1% 8.45 Pts
64-Core 10.8
1% 10.8 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.94%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 36.2
Write 38.3
Mixed 32.7
27% 35.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.11
30% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SG564283FG8NWKF-Z1 1x1GB
1 of 1 slots used
1GB SODIMM DDR2 667 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
6.49% Terrible
MC Read 2.9
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 2
7% 2.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.2
SC Write 1
SC Mixed 0.2
1% 0.47 GB/s
Latency 346
12% 346 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.49%
Great: 13%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback