HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.17% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190412
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateAug 14 '19 at 02:37
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
74.4% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 86.6
2-Core 164
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 333
45% 335 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 3739) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.33
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
7.17% Terrible
Lighting 9.03
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 9.16
7% 8.69 fps
MRender 11
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 7.17
7% 8.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.17%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$31
369GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 270 238 279 296 277 312 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.4% Good
Read 262
Write 98.5
Mixed 236
SusWrite 279
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 40.3
4K Mixed 22.1
78% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 197
174% 259 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
47GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 146 148 148 147 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 146
72% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 76%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
452GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 156 158 158 157 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70.3% Very good
Read 88.7
Write 87
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 156
64% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4G1 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 15.5
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback