Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-7480 Radeon R5, 8 Compute Cores 2C+6G 2,203 User benchmarks, average bench 34% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Memory 27.4 1-Core 40.5 2-Core 50.7 24% 39.5 Pts	4-Core 77.5 8-Core 76.1 10% 76.8 Pts	64-Core 76.3 5% 76.3 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 44%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
FTM24N325H 240GB 458 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 200GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0222A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 255 258 250 273 268 262 MB/s Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 232 Write 216 Mixed 194 SusWrite 261 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 6 33% 13 MB/s	DQ Read 20.3 DQ Write 83.4 DQ Mixed 13.5 22% 39.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A 1x8GB 766 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5.9 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 5.4 16% 5.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 5.3 13% 4.5 GB/s	Latency 270 15% 270 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples	38x
A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 35%, 8,083 samples	36x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	35x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	36x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	31x
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 4%, 4,872 samples	23x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	19x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 4,775 samples	15x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,795 samples	14x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16