Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225 51,836 User benchmarks, average bench 49% CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	60% Good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 79.9 2-Core 132 62% 99.8 Pts	4-Core 193 8-Core 192 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 192 12% 192 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz) 110,588 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Acer(1025 054C) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	2.16% Terrible	Lighting 2.4 Reflection 3.54 Parallax 1.59 2% 2.51 fps	MRender 3.05 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 4.48 3% 2.94 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.16% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120 GB 120GB 14,313 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE3600RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 51 36 54 40 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 312 Write 51.4 Mixed 49.7 SusWrite 46.7 25% 115 MB/s	4K Read 13.4 4K Write 7.4 4K Mixed 12.6 40% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 55%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB 8,778 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 8GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.1 4.6 4.6 4.7 4.5 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	7.05% Terrible	Read 21 Write 13.3 Mixed 14.9 SusWrite 4.5 17% 13.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 2.4 119% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.05% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMT3020EC58E9F1333 Kingston ACR256X64D3S13C9G 6GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.5% Average	MC Read 13.1 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 12.7 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 13.4 38% 13.1 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	13x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	3x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 1TBAdata $95Bench 104%, 26,139 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 120GBKingston $35Bench 67%, 80,916 samples	1x
PX-128M3P 128GBPlextorBench 78%, 229 samples	1x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG 1x4GBNanyaBench 23%, 4,045 samples	3x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 2x2GBHynixBench 33%, 8,194 samples	3x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	1x

Value: 50% - Average

Total price: $255