LG P535-SE7BK

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
CPU throttled at 49% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemLG P535-SE7BK  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel Base Board Product Name
Memory9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111220
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 00:39
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU0%
CPU Throttled 49%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2640M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
40.4% Average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 33.2
2-Core 56
36% 52.3 Pts
4-Core 78.6
8-Core 77.5
10% 78.1 Pts
64-Core 78.9
5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Device(1854 3012) 2GB
Driver: Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 2.33
Reflection 4.58
Parallax 1.56
2% 2.82 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1.27
Splatting 4.3
2% 2.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
619GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GT001L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 34 39 35 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 61
Write 35.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 30.1
27% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 56%
Mass Storage Device 320GB
262GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 9.3 8.6 8.8 8.7 8.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.95% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 7.8
Mixed 8
SusWrite 8.8
12% 8.82 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
31% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.95%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64V3H HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.2% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.4
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback