Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 05:22
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 101
2-Core 191
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 418
48% 372 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.5% Average
Lighting 52.1
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 50.3
42% 55 fps
MRender 64
Gravity 52.3
Splatting 61.4
49% 59.2 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 53 37 91 106 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.7% Below average
Read 238
Write 206
Mixed 194
SusWrite 101
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 16.5
62% 20.3 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 25.9
36% 67.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
144GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 161 158 160 163 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 153
Write 130
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 160
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF QUM3U-4G1333C9 99U5471-054.A00LF QUM3U-4G1333C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback