PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 EVO (all builds) |
Memory | 19.2 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 1.7 Days |
Run Date | Aug 19 '19 at 05:22 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1240 V2-$345
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
73.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
Nvidia(10DE 1B84) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.5%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$41
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 53 37 91 106 116 MB/s
|
38.7%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
144GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 161 161 158 160 163 MB/s
|
89.7%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston 99U5471-054.A00LF QUM3U-4G1333C9 99U5471-054.A00LF QUM3U-4G1333C9 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
|
48.3%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 237x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 130x |
Core i7-2600Intel $81Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 80x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 44x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 39x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 30x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $666 |