Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory19.5 GB free of 24.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 19 '19 at 23:33
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5660
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 132
54% 91.9 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 455
42% 353 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
HP(103C 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 7% Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$59
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 104 104 105 104 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.4% Average
Read 182
Write 188
Mixed 170
SusWrite 104
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 25.9
85% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 27.7
DQ Write 73.3
DQ Mixed 34.6
31% 45.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 84%
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
148GB free
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 100 75 85 103 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49.7% Average
Read 229
Write 214
Mixed 185
SusWrite 97.1
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 30.4
103% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 32
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 39.9
35% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 108%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 429GB
307GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 105 105 105 107 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.8% Average
Read 218
Write 209
Mixed 200
SusWrite 106
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 30.8
100% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 35.8
DQ Write 71.4
DQ Mixed 46.3
37% 51.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 131%
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
30GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
18.1% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 29.2
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 30.2
22% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 57%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
518GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 112 100 75 86 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.9% Very good
Read 170
Write 150
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 97.2
94% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 ID:80 AD HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 ID:80 2C 36JSZF51272PY1G4D1 58GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.5% Average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 19.6
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.17 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback