Lenovo 10093

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10093  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 26 '19 at 15:13
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 179
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 363
8-Core 358
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 250E
Sapphire(174B A001) 1GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.7.5
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.3
Reflection 13.5
Parallax 14.7
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 11.7
Gravity 10.9
Splatting 16.2
11% 12.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$48
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 236 238 234 240 235 223 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.9% Good
Read 252
Write 239
Mixed 235
SusWrite 234
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 34.6
112% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 98
DQ Mixed 137
93% 113 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
832GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 162 164 159 159 168 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 113
Write 90.1
Mixed 41.2
SusWrite 162
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
107% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030MM58E8F1600 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.8% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.1
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10093 Builds (Compare 106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10093

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback