Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z270-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-P  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateAug 27 '19 at 18:57
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$246
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 30.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 205
58% 114 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 289
50% 353 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 110
Parallax 100
85% 105 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 91.9
Splatting 80.6
80% 101 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2016)
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 73 80 77 70 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 376
Write 132
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 84
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 0.2
34% 15.2 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 33.2
79% 161 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 70%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
537GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 150 152 152 152 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 160
Write 157
Mixed 97.8
SusWrite 152
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 109%
WD Elements 500GB
28GB free, PID 10a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 107
Write 103
Mixed 54.2
108% 88.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FBD 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 10.3
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 5.5
19% 6.6 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-P Builds (Compare 6,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-P - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $724
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback