ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ZBOOKSTUDIO

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	252% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP ZBOOKSTUDIO (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8427
Memory	7.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190415
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 02 '19 at 20:15
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E-2176M 4,000 User benchmarks, average bench 77% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 75.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 267 86% 160 Pts	4-Core 526 8-Core 733 79% 630 Pts	64-Core 877 54% 877 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics P630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? HP(103C 8427) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7000 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.92% Terrible	Lighting 6.47 Reflection 25 Parallax 8.19 5% 13.2 fps	MRender 8.29 Gravity 5.67 Splatting 11.3 7% 8.43 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.92% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 21,542 User benchmarks, average bench 238% 413GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXA74H0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1451 1415 1353 1343 1382 1207 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	252% Outstanding	Read 1,099 Write 1,224 Mixed 472 SusWrite 1,358 234% 1,038 MB/s	4K Read 48.7 4K Write 128 4K Mixed 66.6 227% 81.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,284 DQ Write 1,166 DQ Mixed 1,026 824% 1,159 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 252% Great: 306%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 3.0 16GB 2,979 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 15GB free, PID 5597 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 17 17 16 17 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 117 Write 11 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 16.4 38% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 1.4 84% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS7CJR8N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.8% Average	MC Read 18.6 MC Write 16.4 MC Mixed 12.7 45% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 12.7 39% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback