Today's hottest deals

IT P95xER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (6th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 94 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 63% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
SystemIT P95xER  (all builds)
MotherboardIT P95xER
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 07 '19 at 06:29
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 24%
CPU Throttled 63%

 PC Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
51% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 88.5
44% 68.4 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 272
26% 217 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Clevo(1558 95E1) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1967
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.6% Poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 70.5
8% 30.7 fps
MRender 40.7
Gravity 54.7
Splatting 72.3
48% 55.9 fps
Poor: 44%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 69%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 3.4 47 9.9 11 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 339
Write 290
Mixed 249
SusWrite 47.9
52% 232 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 6.9
24% 7.77 MB/s
DQ Read 64
DQ Write 66.6
DQ Mixed 14.7
25% 48.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 55%
Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
104GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 347 346 363 360 336 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 366
Write 359
Mixed 347
SusWrite 353
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 32.1
4K Mixed 16.2
59% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 265
DQ Write 243
DQ Mixed 252
190% 253 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 126%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 19.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P95xER Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: IT P95xER

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback