Today's hottest deals

Asus GX501VIK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive232% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GX501VIK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GX501VIK
Memory16.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190709
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 14:54
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 82.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 190
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 566
56% 459 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080 (Mobile Max-Q)
Asus(1043 1BF0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.9% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 45.4
Parallax 36.9
32% 40.6 fps
MRender 56.6
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 51.6
40% 49.2 fps
Poor: 61%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 85%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
631GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1262 1316 1300 1272 1255 1284 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,202
Write 1,181
Mixed 390
SusWrite 1,281
228% 1,014 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 59.9
203% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,033
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 957
717% 958 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 232%
Great: 331%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
45.7% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 13.7
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 76.8
52% 76.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GX501VIK Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Asus GX501VIK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback