PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 42.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P5P43TD (all builds) |
Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20100622 |
Uptime | 20.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 08 '19 at 20:02 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
42.6%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 560-$180
EVGA(3842 1463) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
15.6%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
389GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 47 57 54 56 MB/s
|
42.3%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
268GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 58 58 59 57 59 MB/s
|
31.7%
Below average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
7GB free, PID 5530,
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.9 5.1 5.8 5.8 4.9 MB/s
|
4.96%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 19x |
Core2 Quad Q8300Intel $115Bench 44%, 20,482 samples | 9x |
Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 9x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 6x |
GeForce GTS 250NvidiaBench 7%, 14,881 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $290 |