MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI Z1-7309
MotherboardMSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)  (all builds)
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091016
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 08 '19 at 20:50
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom 9850
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
50.3% Above average
Memory 74.4
1-Core 40.6
2-Core 86.6
44% 67.2 Pts
4-Core 153
8-Core 162
21% 158 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6150SE nForce 430
MSI(1462 7309) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 295.73
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 0% Great: 0%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA 1TB-$54
804GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 91 90 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 86.3
Write 74.2
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 88.3
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664AA800.M16FJ CT25664AA800.M16FJ 4GB
400, 400 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.2% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 9
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 91.6
44% 91.6 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 27%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309) Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI K9N6PGM2-V2 (MS-7309)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback