Lenovo 20FAS1M300

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.55% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20FAS1M300  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20FAS1M300
Memory10.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160602
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 04 '16 at 05:46
Run Duration86 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 194
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 283
38% 282 Pts
64-Core 282
17% 282 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 2233) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4505
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.55% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 10
Parallax 6.69
6% 7.86 fps
MRender 8.81
Gravity 5.93
Splatting 14.2
8% 9.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.55%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000L7 256GB
199GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT23L6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 490
Write 440
Mixed 497
106% 476 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 84.9
4K Mixed 25.5
136% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 36
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 25.6
29% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 21
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback