Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire V3-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 80% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA50_HC_CR
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '19 at 16:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User TUN-User
Background CPU5%
CPU Throttled 80%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 55
2-Core 109
50% 79.7 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 136
18% 136 Pts
64-Core 141
9% 141 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Acer(1025 0647) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5069
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 5.31
Parallax 2.75
0% 2.71 fps
MRender 4.76
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.49%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HM160HI 160GB-$50
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HH100-06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 51 50 50 50 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 56
Write 61.2
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 48.8
38% 51 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EBJ21UE8BAU0-AE-E Micron 16JSF25664HZ-1G1F1 4GB
533, 533 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.9% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 14.1
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 11.5
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 89.8
44% 89.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-571G Builds (Compare 1,014 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $77
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback