Asrock H81M-VG4 R4.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.83% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-VG4 R4.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190401
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 10:56
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$79
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 120
59% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 185
23% 174 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Zotac(19DA 2324) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 430.86
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.83% Terrible
Lighting 8.93
Reflection 7.85
Parallax 9.47
7% 8.75 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 7.27
Splatting 4.65
6% 7.69 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.83%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 91 111 111 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
67.2% Good
Read 127
Write 124
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 108
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
71% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 67.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9DNCCN4E-TATP 1310 9DECCN4E-TATP 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.3% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-VG4 R4.0 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-VG4 R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback