MSI AM1M (MS-7865)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7865
MotherboardMSI AM1M (MS-7865)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 11 '19 at 14:04
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5370 APU R3
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Memory 52.8
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 42
30% 42.6 Pts
4-Core 129
8-Core 128
17% 128 Pts
64-Core 133
8% 133 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Gigabyte(1458 354E) 2GB
CLim: 1254 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 25.3
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 31.2
21% 26.7 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 25.2
24% 29.5 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HCS5C1025CLA382 250GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC1OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 12 9.8 8.3 6.7 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 49.7
Write 55
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 10.6
29% 38.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 62%
MB2000EAZNL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: HPG4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 126 128 135 135 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Read 146
Write 133
Mixed 77.8
SusWrite 130
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
222% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF CT102464BA160B.C16 16GB
800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.4
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 151
27% 151 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1M (MS-7865) Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI AM1M (MS-7865)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $91
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback