MSI Z77MA-S41 (MS-7756)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7756
MotherboardMSI Z77MA-S41 (MS-7756)  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '19 at 06:24
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 86.8
1-Core 85.5
2-Core 190
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 490
52% 415 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
Nvidia(10DE 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.48% Terrible
Lighting 7.6
Reflection 8.92
Parallax 6.41
6% 7.64 fps
MRender 9.52
Gravity 7.87
Splatting 8.48
7% 8.62 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.48%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF004C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 261 264 263 265 264 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 477
Write 304
Mixed 295
SusWrite 262
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 74
4K Mixed 32.3
120% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 300
DQ Write 274
DQ Mixed 219
183% 264 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 117%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
160GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 178 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 386
Write 383
Mixed 318
SusWrite 171
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 18.4
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 11.5
50% 15 MB/s
DQ Read 38.5
DQ Write 14.8
DQ Mixed 15.2
14% 22.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Team-Elite-1600 04CB AM2U16BC4R1-B08S 04EF Team-Elite-1600 04CB AM2U16BC4R1-B08S 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 15.2
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 70.7
57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback