Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '19 at 17:01
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 224
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 448
8-Core 744
73% 596 Pts
64-Core 930
58% 930 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB; Palit
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.3% Good
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 82.4
Parallax 71.2
75% 81.7 fps
MRender 68.7
Gravity 75.5
Splatting 72
59% 72 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 73%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$24
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMJ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 462 459 189 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 433
Write 183
Mixed 402
SusWrite 272
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 41.6
149% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 192
174% 260 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron AFLD48EK1P 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 25.9
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 31.9
SC Mixed 26.8
78% 27.3 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,584 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $273
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback