Fujitsu ESPRIMO E400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E400  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2990-A2
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 16 '19 at 14:15
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2320-$165
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 77.7
2-Core 158
63% 106 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 296
38% 289 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Gigabyte(1458 3667) 2GB
CLim: 1406 MHz, MLim: 1650 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 18.3
Parallax 21.8
19% 21.1 fps
MRender 27.8
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 18.3
18% 23.3 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE500000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 75 21 13 30 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.9% Poor
Read 209
Write 155
Mixed 112
SusWrite 50.6
29% 132 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 16.1
4K Mixed 16.6
53% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 18.6
DQ Write 18.3
DQ Mixed 15.3
12% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 53%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
178GB free
Firmware: JC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 120 120 120 120 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 107
Write 108
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 118
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 70%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
35GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 113 98 100 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
70% Good
Read 139
Write 116
Mixed 31
SusWrite 105
71% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BA1339.M16 Kingston KHX1600C10D3/8G 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.2
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 75
53% 75 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E400 Builds (Compare 80 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $48
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback