Toshiba SATELLITE M50D-A

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE M50D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA ZEMAE
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140630
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 19 '19 at 19:23
Run Duration	121 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-5200 APU 10,450 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 36.3 1-Core 31.1 2-Core 62.5 26% 43.3 Pts	4-Core 114 8-Core 123 16% 119 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3 11,968 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FAD0) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	1.42% Terrible	Lighting 1.5 Reflection 3.46 Parallax 1.91 1% 2.29 fps	MRender 2.48 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.7 2% 2.16 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.42% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB 10,970 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 189GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 343 399 368 345 337 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	66.8% Good	Read 390 Write 335 Mixed 308 SusWrite 354 78% 347 MB/s	4K Read 22.2 4K Write 38 4K Mixed 14.9 73% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 33.2 66% 132 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905603-035.A00G Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.7% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3.7 10% 3.43 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.4 GB/s	Latency 220 18% 220 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE M50D-A Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE M50D-A

CPU
A4-5000 APUAMDBench 27%, 10,330 samples	3x
A6-5200 APUAMDBench 30%, 10,450 samples	3x

GPU
Radeon HD 8400-R3AMDBench 2%, 11,968 samples	3x
Radeon HD 8330AMDBench 2%, 8,573 samples	3x

SSD
Premier SP550 240GBAdata $74Bench 79%, 29,295 samples	1x
WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH30 120GBWDCBench 40%, 420 samples	1x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 38,580 samples	2x
8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 48%, 14,177 samples	1x
M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 4,546 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $74

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16