Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '16 at 10:38
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 97.7
2-Core 192
75% 127 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 474
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 479
30% 479 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 77%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.96% Terrible
Lighting 9.43
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 3.25
8% 7.39 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 6.17
6% 6.89 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.96%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 Pro. 256GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JYRA0101 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Read 517
Write 482
Mixed 422
106% 474 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 34.8
103% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 133
126% 194 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
370GB free
Firmware: CC46 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 109
Write 104
Mixed 23.9
57% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.52
111% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-001.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF 9905471-001.A00LF 9905471-001.A01LF 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.2% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.7
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 971 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $109
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback