Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 630 7,197 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	Memory 44.6 1-Core 36.2 2-Core 60.6 30% 47.1 Pts	4-Core 104 8-Core 115 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 53%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
ATI Radeon HD 5400 10,400 User benchmarks, average bench 1% PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.0 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.15% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.15 Parallax 1.75 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 1.83 2% 1.81 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.15% Great: 1%
44 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2A92) 256MB Driver: atiu9p64 aticfx64 aticfx64 atiu9pag aticfx32 aticfx32 atiumd64 atidxx64 atidxx64 atiumdag atidxx32 atidxx32 atiumdva atiumd6a atitmm64 Ver. 8.702.0.0 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	0.5% Terrible	Lighting 0.57 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.47 0% 0.7 fps	MRender 0.76 Gravity 0.27 Splatting 1 1% 0.68 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.5% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM0 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.1% Very poor	Read 52.3 Write 134 Mixed 71.3 20% 85.9 MB/s	4K Read 4.57 4K Write 16.1 4K Mixed 2.04 18% 7.55 MB/s	DQ Read 6.08 DQ Write 25.8 DQ Mixed 2.85 6% 11.6 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 76%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 138GB free Firmware: MS1O Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	68% Good	Read 129 Write 108 Mixed 104 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.19 77% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 103%
ST3000DM 001-1ER166 3TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1TB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	6.36% Terrible	Read 18.4 Write 16 Mixed 8.13 17% 14.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.05 4K Write 0.06 4K Mixed 0.06 4% 0.06 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 6.36% Great: 72%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 369GB free, PID 10b8 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	6.29% Terrible	Read 18.2 Write 16 Mixed 15.5 21% 16.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.03 4K Write 0.05 4K Mixed 0.03 3% 0.04 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.29% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT51264BA1339.C16F CT51264BA1339.C16F Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 Micron 16JTF25664AZ-1G4F1 12GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 5.9 MC Mixed 8.6 22% 7.87 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 4.2 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 182 22% 182 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	5x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	2x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x

SSD
SA400S3 239GBKingstonBench 60%, 5 samples	1x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 1x4GBNanyaBench 29%, 1,235 samples	1x
HP497157-C01-ELDW 2x2GBKingstonBench 35%, 88 samples	1x
F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 8GBUnknownBench 35%, 364 samples	1x