Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 27 '19 at 14:27
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$75
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 219
81% 140 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 580
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.30
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 47.8
Reflection 55.1
Parallax 44.8
39% 49.2 fps
MRender 68.2
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 62.3
49% 59.4 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500G 500GB
79GB free
Firmware: MAT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 268 123 74 67 66 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 496
Mixed 352
SusWrite 175
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 50.6
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 70.3
248% 91.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 348
265% 359 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 493
Mixed 327
98% 441 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 58.2
219% 80.9 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 182
186% 302 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
59GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 136 133 136 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 87.7
Write 88
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 135
69% 94.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
223% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 109%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$64
68GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 147 106 147 141 146 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
66.9% Good
Read 96
Write 94.8
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 136
73% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.9
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 958 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $478
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback