Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE V EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 29 '19 at 16:44
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Memory 92.4
1-Core 102
2-Core 216
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 426
8-Core 626
66% 526 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
EVGA(3842 2784) 3GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 53.6
Parallax 74.9
46% 61.7 fps
MRender 69.6
Gravity 63.8
Splatting 50.7
49% 61.4 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
544GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 908 509 508 503 497 500 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199
551GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 474 424 396 399 466 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 353
Mixed 343
SusWrite 438
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 54.5
179% 61.5 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 128
160% 283 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 126%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
15GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 6.1 5 4.7 4.8 4.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 7.5
Mixed 9
SusWrite 5.1
14% 14 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.9
114% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 13%
ASMT 2105 3TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 139 140 138 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Read 148
Write 143
Mixed 83.2
SusWrite 138
171% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 58%
ASMT 2105 4TB
3TB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 140 141 142 142 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 168
Write 130
Mixed 49
SusWrite 141
156% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GB-$140
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 43
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 43.6
124% 43.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 21.8
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 111%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE V EXTREME Builds (Compare 2,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE V EXTREME - $122

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $630
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback