Microelectronics G155

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMicroelectronics G155  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B360M-A
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime4 Days
Run DateSep 30 '19 at 21:36
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 490
8-Core 717
75% 604 Pts
64-Core 722
45% 722 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 29.2
Parallax 36
30% 34.2 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 36.5
Splatting 34.3
30% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+932GBHDD 1TB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 137 108 121 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 88%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
7.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 38
Write 35.2
Mixed 33
SusWrite 37.5
49% 35.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.1
213% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE400UD51208-2666 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.6% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 13.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G155 Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Microelectronics G155

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $253
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback