Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 5150 APU R3 453 User benchmarks, average bench 32% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Memory 37.4 1-Core 16.5 2-Core 30.3 20% 28.1 Pts	4-Core 45.7 8-Core 59.8 7% 52.8 Pts	64-Core 54.5 3% 54.5 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520 16,336 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 83A0) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.56% Terrible	Lighting 1.73 Reflection 1.88 Parallax 0.66 1% 1.42 fps	MRender 2.57 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.04 2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.56% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2CV102M3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 48 49 49 49 51 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	28.6% Poor	Read 215 Write 78.8 Mixed 55.6 SusWrite 51.3 22% 100 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 19.8 4K Mixed 8.3 42% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 67.6 DQ Mixed 56.2 54% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 44%
Seagate ST9120821AS 120GB 605 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 49GB free Firmware: 7.24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 31 31 31 31 31 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 36.9 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 31.1 24% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 99U5402-463.A00LF 2x4GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 5.4 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 5.1 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 4.8 11% 3.73 GB/s	Latency 215 19% 215 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Athlon 5350 APU R3AMDBench 34%, 3,720 samples	19x
Sempron 3850 APU R3AMDBench 29%, 134 samples	2x
Athlon 5150 APU R3AMDBench 32%, 453 samples	1x

SSD
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
Q300 480GBToshiba $152Bench 80%, 5,920 samples	2x

RAM
9905403-173.A00LF 2x2GBUnknownBench 16%, 3 samples	2x
CT102464BA160B.C16 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 11,058 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 3,140 samples	1x

Value: 10% - Very poor

Total price: $45