PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170515 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 04 '19 at 14:27 |
Run Duration | 170 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 40% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
40.5%
Average
|
45% 77.7 Pts
|
24% 182 Pts
|
12% 187 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.15
|
54.6%
Above average
|
54% 65.9 fps
|
55% 66.9 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 54 57 61 66 73 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
29% 131 MB/s
|
43% 17 MB/s
|
48% 101 MB/s
|
![]() WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
245GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 66 81 85 85 88 MB/s
|
57.3%
Above average
|
68% 93 MB/s
|
193% 1.43 MB/s
|
|
![]() Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
229GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 132 134 135 133 MB/s
|
61.3%
Good
|
56% 77.9 MB/s
|
101% 0.73 MB/s
|
|
![]() Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
249GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 97 98 96 MB/s
|
79%
Very good
|
85% 117 MB/s
|
153% 1.3 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown F4-2133C15-4GIS F4-2400C15-4GIS 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
31.4%
Below average
|
34% 11.7 GB/s
|
19% 6.53 GB/s
|
25% 159 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,478x |
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,324x |
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,015x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 965x |
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 747x |
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 661x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 101% - Outstanding | Total price: $326 |