Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics54.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 04 '19 at 14:27
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 40%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-9600 APU (2016 D.BR)
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 63.3
2-Core 119
45% 77.7 Pts
4-Core 175
8-Core 190
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 187
12% 187 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing below potential (94th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (67 fps cap detected)
54.6% Above average
Lighting 66.9
Reflection 66.7
Parallax 64.1
54% 65.9 fps
MRender 68.4
Gravity 65.3
Splatting 66.9
55% 66.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 54 57 61 66 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.4% Below average
Read 262
Write 69
Mixed 126
SusWrite 68.9
29% 131 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 0.1
43% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 95.5
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 16.1
48% 101 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
245GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 66 81 85 85 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 119
Write 104
Mixed 68
SusWrite 80.4
68% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS5C3020BLE630 2TB
229GB free
Firmware: MZ4OAAB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 135 132 134 135 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
61.3% Good
Read 80.3
Write 79
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 133
56% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
249GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 93 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 180
Write 173
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 95.4
85% 117 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2133C15-4GIS F4-2400C15-4GIS 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.4% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 8
MC Mixed 13.5
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,231 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $326
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback