Today's hottest deals

MSI Z68A-G45 (G3) (MS-7750)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.38% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7750
MotherboardMSI Z68A-G45 (G3) (MS-7750)  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '19 at 05:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 93.3
2-Core 181
73% 122 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 359
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Asus EAH6750
Asus(1043 0475) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.840.9.0
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
6.38% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 9.35
Parallax 9.88
10% 10.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.38%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7PD128HCFV-000H1 128GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 368 368 368 375 384 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Read 452
Write 47
Mixed 138
SusWrite 357
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 29
4K Write 71.9
4K Mixed 32
123% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 34.8
DQ Write 97.1
DQ Mixed 39.4
38% 57.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
814GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 99 99 99 101 100 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 96.5
Write 89.3
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 99.3
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
88% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Nanya M2P2G64CB8HC5N-DG Nanya M2P2G64CB8HC5N-DG 8GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.2% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17.9
56% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.3
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 62.5
64% 62.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68A-G45 (G3) (MS-7750) Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI Z68A-G45 (G3) (MS-7750)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $516
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback