Lenovo 20C60053LS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20C60053LS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20C60053LS
Memory2.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131004
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 11 '19 at 03:38
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 83.3
1-Core 87.5
2-Core 144
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 220
27% 206 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5028) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.73
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 6.22
3% 5.48 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 2.37
Splatting 8.91
5% 5.86 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.73%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 30 18 100 24 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 405
Write 118
Mixed 337
SusWrite 67.2
51% 232 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 31.2
118% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 218
190% 281 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 102%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
2GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 10 13 26 36 37 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 75.2
Write 15.7
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 21.6
38% 35 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.1
83% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451S6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5173DX0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20C60053LS Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 20C60053LS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback