HP 860-090nz

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP 860-090nz  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B4B
Memory16.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151112
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateOct 13 '19 at 15:03
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User ALB-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$163
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 125
2-Core 59.3
62% 88.9 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 690
60% 514 Pts
64-Core 693
43% 693 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
HP(103C 2B62) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.7
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.3% Very good
Lighting 97.6
Reflection 102
Parallax 92.3
80% 97.3 fps
MRender 85.5
Gravity 88.9
Splatting 74.5
67% 83 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB2Q-512G-1006 512GB
227GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180006
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 321 369 370 376 379 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Read 424
Write 369
Mixed 231
SusWrite 350
77% 343 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 53.4
4K Mixed 27.8
98% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 151
152% 244 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 101%
Seagate SkyHawk 8TB (2016)-$170
573GB free
Firmware: AV01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 208 213 189 194 191 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
76GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 91 91 93 94 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
52.3% Above average
Read 89.5
Write 83.5
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 92.2
58% 79 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 83%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB
41GB free, PID 25ee
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 105 107 107 119 116 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55% Above average
Read 118
Write 129
Mixed 100
SusWrite 108
155% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.8
188% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55%
Great: 98%
Sony MRW-E90 256GB
127GB free, PID 0baf
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 70 73 73 75 74 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.5% Below average
Read 86
Write 77
Mixed 67
SusWrite 71.1
101% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 5
297% 5.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 23.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 25.1
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 860-090nz Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

System: HP 860-090nz

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback