Today's hottest deals

Quanta NL5A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQuanta NL5A  (all builds)
MotherboardQuanta NL5
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170615
Uptime3.8 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 02:58
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 91.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 201
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 397
52% 393 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Quanta(152D 1155) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.3648
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 36.2
33% 35.6 fps
MRender 38.3
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 35
30% 37.5 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M.2-2280 256GB 256GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 416 426 428 442 429 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 439
Mixed 364
SusWrite 424
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 86.5
4K Mixed 47.1
159% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 233
DQ Mixed 218
152% 186 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
87GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 108 106 109 112 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
62.9% Good
Read 110
Write 104
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 108
62% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.9%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron ILG8GS2400A 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NL5A Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

System: Quanta NL5A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback