Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20235

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20235  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory4.3 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 14 '19 at 06:44
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 86.9
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 109
55% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 155
21% 155 Pts
64-Core 155
10% 155 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3800) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 10.17.10.4229
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
1.9% Terrible
Lighting 2.07
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.26 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 4
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.9%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SP900 64GB
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5.0.Be
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 67 65 67 66 68 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.3% Average
Read 219
Write 75.4
Mixed 111
SusWrite 67
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 21.1
80% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 75.6
DQ Mixed 79.5
62% 85.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 62%
Toshiba MK3265GSXF 320GB
256GB free
Firmware: GP005B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 83 84 85 84 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 83.9
Write 83.5
Mixed 40.1
SusWrite 84
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170ED58F8W1600 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 6GB
1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.8
42% 14.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.2
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20235 Builds (Compare 109 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20235

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback