HP CQ1131ES

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP CQ1131ES  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ACA
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20111028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '19 at 11:34
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 88%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E-450 APU
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.65 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Memory 50.3
1-Core 19.9
2-Core 34.9
25% 35 Pts
4-Core 32.6
8-Core 38.3
5% 35.4 Pts
64-Core 39.1
2% 39.1 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500BEVS-22UST0 250GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 46 30 31 32 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 53.3
Write 53
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 38.5
33% 44.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 32%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
0GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13.8
Write 8.8
Mixed 9
13% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
20% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HC5N-CG Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 4GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 4
MC Mixed 4.7
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 3.1
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback