MSI Z77MA-G45 (MS-7759)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7759
MotherboardMSI Z77MA-G45 (MS-7759)  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121217
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateOct 17 '19 at 19:24
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 215
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 510
59% 460 Pts
64-Core 521
32% 521 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
MSI(1462 8A96) 2GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.9% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 8.96
Parallax 10.3
8% 9.74 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 11.9
Splatting 13
10% 12.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.9%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 487
Write 436
Mixed 337
93% 420 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 89.4
4K Mixed 34.5
133% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 351
268% 363 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
704GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 181 178 183 179 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 157
Mixed 77.6
SusWrite 176
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 100 102 101 101 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 90.2
Write 90.7
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 98.7
112% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 61%
TOSHIBA STOR.E ALU 2S 1TB
741GB free, PID 0b1a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 73 73 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
27.2% Poor
Read 71.1
Write 69.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 71.3
78% 59.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 43%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 128GB-$80
113GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 29 28 27 28 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 25.7
Mixed 25.7
SusWrite 27.4
37% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.4
92% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 104%
Adata DashDrive Elite S102 Pro USB 3.0 64GB-$13
29GB free, PID 312b
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 46 56 56 56 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
29.6% Poor
Read 110
Write 69.2
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 51.9
78% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.6%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 04CD F3-1866C10-8GSR 04CD F3-14900CL9-4GBSR 04CD F3-1866C10-8GSR 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 15.7
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77MA-G45 (MS-7759) Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Z77MA-G45 (MS-7759)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $172
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback