Today's hottest deals

HP Z800 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Z800 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0AECh
Memory51.3 GB free of 64.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 19 '19 at 11:36
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5670
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 91.4
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 162
68% 112 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 638
56% 478 Pts
64-Core 948
59% 948 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Lighting 65.5
Reflection 57.5
Parallax 87.3
53% 70.1 fps
MRender 58.7
Gravity 61.8
Splatting 76.2
55% 65.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$215
345GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 179 177 186 188 185 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
51.7% Above average
Read 221
Write 178
Mixed 188
SusWrite 184
43% 193 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 21.7
74% 26.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 198
148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 124%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 184 186 186 186 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,628
Write 893
Mixed 1,159
SusWrite 188
214% 967 MB/s
4K Read 46.8
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 41.5
146% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 214
163% 221 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 132%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-YH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B1K70CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M... 98GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.2% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.5 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z800 Workstation Builds (Compare 1,991 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z800 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback