Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6300-$90 261,607 User benchmarks, average bench 55% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 86.9 1-Core 72.3 2-Core 127 60% 95.5 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 288 32% 254 Pts	64-Core 290 18% 290 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% XFX(1682 3222) 3GB CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.10.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 35.6 Reflection 25.4 Parallax 43.9 29% 35 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 34.7 Splatting 31.4 25% 30.3 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7SB3Q128G1001 128GB 475 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: X2160001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 114 119 121 122 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	44.9% Average	Read 125 Write 122 Mixed 108 SusWrite 117 27% 118 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 45.1 4K Mixed 27.5 96% 32.4 MB/s	DQ Read 38.8 DQ Write 90.2 DQ Mixed 74.1 54% 67.7 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 93%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30 12,344 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 290GB free Firmware: 01.01S02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 83 95 110 109 110 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	59.3% Above average	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 102 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 191% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 59.3% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Transcend JM1333KLN-2G Transcend JM1333KLN-2G 8GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	43.1% Average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 12.4 MC Mixed 14.9 43% 15.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.6 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 12.1 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	44x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729