Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS/BR (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181129
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '19 at 14:39
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$70 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 85 1-Core 102 2-Core 203 74% 130 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 383 51% 383 Pts	64-Core 390 24% 390 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.1% Below average	Lighting 37.4 Reflection 29.2 Parallax 36 30% 34.2 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 34.5 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HDWD105 960GB 294GB free (System drive) Firmware: R0822A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 225 2.6 63 38 2.5 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 491 Write 428 Mixed 16.5 SusWrite 87.8 56% 256 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 20.4 65% 17.5 MB/s	DQ Read 193 DQ Write 10.6 DQ Mixed 14 32% 72.7 MB/s

Toshiba P300 1TB-$32 318,836 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 578GB free Firmware: MS2OA8J0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 169 171 172 173 156 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	93.3% Outstanding	Read 158 Write 148 Mixed 34.3 SusWrite 168 92% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 151% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSEK.8FBD Kingston KHX2400C15/8G 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	69.5% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 27.1 MC Mixed 21.5 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 24.2 SC Mixed 21.6 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 71.9 56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 668 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	255x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	100x
Core i3-7100Intel $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	133x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	97x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	38x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	19x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353