Avell C75 RTX MUV / G1750 RTX MUV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.34% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive18.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAvell C75 RTX MUV / G1750 RTX MUV  (all builds)
MotherboardAvell C75 RTX MUV / G1750 RTX MUV
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 20 '19 at 22:30
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 89.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 253
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 777
77% 626 Pts
64-Core 995
62% 995 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1D05 105D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6519
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.34% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 120
Parallax 8.22
6% 45.1 fps
MRender 12.3
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 16.3
10% 12 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.34%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSM28512GPTCB3B-S114613 512GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 1.1 62 84 5 152 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.1% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 181
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 75.7
20% 85.5 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 18.6
4K Mixed 4.6
32% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 55.9
DQ Write 79.6
DQ Mixed 5.3
22% 46.9 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 18.1%
Great: 81%
ST500LT0 12-1DG142 500GB
401GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 21 10 16 35 9.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Read 7
Write 9.7
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 16.5
14% 9.73 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800SO102408-2666A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
78% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 22.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 30.2
SC Mixed 26
71% 24.9 GB/s
Latency 68.2
59% 68.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 78%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical C75 RTX MUV / G1750 RTX MUV Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

System: Avell C75 RTX MUV / G1750 RTX MUV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback