Asus P8Z68-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V LX  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110715
Uptime10.6 Days
Run DateNov 21 '16 at 01:00
Run Duration263 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 88.6
2-Core 170
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 398
37% 308 Pts
64-Core 430
27% 430 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V2 1.35 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 844D) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.43
Reflection 3.08
Parallax 1.69
2% 2.4 fps
MRender 3.43
Gravity 1.37
Splatting 4.7
3% 3.16 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.3% Good
Read 264
Write 210
Mixed 218
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 41.9
4K Mixed 33.8
109% 34.8 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 89.6
90% 145 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
295GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 82.2
Write 102
Mixed 87.2
68% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.41
80% 0.59 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
38GB free
Firmware: CC32 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
57% Above average
Read 91.7
Write 107
Mixed 94.3
74% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.23
4K Write 0.69
4K Mixed 0.52
81% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57%
Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MD04ACA500 5TB
614GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16.9% Very poor
Read 31.6
Write 25.8
Mixed 28.6
36% 28.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.26
84% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 76%
WDC WD10 EADS-00L5B1 1TB
552GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 31.3
Write 25.3
Mixed 13.6
28% 23.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 1.84
4K Mixed 0.28
74% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.27 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 5.5
17% 5.9 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V LX Builds (Compare 1,868 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $333
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback