Asus B150M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive9.03% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus B150M-A  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 22 '16 at 03:29
Run Duration384 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 243
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 654
65% 531 Pts
64-Core 668
41% 668 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 375.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 45.3
Parallax 40
39% 44.3 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 40.9
Splatting 36.9
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 376GB
18GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 73.1
Write 49.5
Mixed 56.9
13% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.55
4K Write 8.64
4K Mixed 4.71
22% 6.97 MB/s
DQ Read 8.43
DQ Write 7.95
DQ Mixed 3.74
4% 6.7 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 14%
Richdisk device 236GB
16GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
8.78% Terrible
Read 71.1
Write 48.8
Mixed 60
13% 60 MB/s
4K Read 4.28
4K Write 2.74
4K Mixed 1.74
10% 2.92 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 8.78%
Great: 18%
Richdisk device 64GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Read 68.9
Write 47.7
Mixed 52.7
12% 56.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.69
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 2.69
11% 2.82 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 31%
Richdisk device 268GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 75.9
Write 52.1
Mixed 53.1
13% 60.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.31
4K Write 8.04
4K Mixed 4.01
20% 6.45 MB/s
DQ Read 7.5
DQ Write 6.18
DQ Mixed 3.4
4% 5.69 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 23%
Richdisk device 376GB
10GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.7% Very poor
Read 76.1
Write 51.1
Mixed 58
14% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.91
4K Write 8.25
4K Mixed 4.42
20% 6.53 MB/s
DQ Read 7.45
DQ Write 9.41
DQ Mixed 4.46
4% 7.11 MB/s
Richdisk device 268GB
32GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.4% Below average
Read 82.3
Write 48
Mixed 65.4
49% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 7.97
4K Mixed 3.99
765% 5.39 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 38%
Richdisk device 472GB
26GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 50.3
Mixed 63
49% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 5.47
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 3.06
612% 3.62 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 41%
Richdisk device 268GB
12GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
36% Below average
Read 71.2
Write 50.5
Mixed 62.1
46% 61.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.96
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 3.77
787% 5.41 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 36%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
41.1% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 10.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M-A Builds (Compare 1,264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus B150M-A - $285

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $878
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback