Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics36.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171227
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '19 at 18:10
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 1.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 63.5
1-Core 21.1
2-Core 39.6
30% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 75.4
8-Core 158
14% 117 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 440.97
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.2% Below average
Lighting 32.1
Reflection 58.8
Parallax 63.2
26% 51.4 fps
MRender 69.8
Gravity 68
Splatting 67
56% 68.3 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Digistor 256GB 256GB
152GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM02.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 246 184 226 289 250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 305
Write 315
Mixed 244
SusWrite 240
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 17.5
57% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 118
99% 146 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 98%
Digistor 256GB 256GB
124GB free
Firmware: SAFM02.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 317 344 343 348 356 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 388
Write 350
Mixed 206
SusWrite 335
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 23.6
4K Mixed 17.6
57% 18.5 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 89.5
78% 113 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 98%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
709GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 139 134 138 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 108
Write 104
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 135
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
207% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2473 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
44.4% Average
MC Read 15.5
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 18.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 8.6
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO Builds (Compare 7,107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $958
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback