Intel DH55PJ

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemINTEL_ DH55PJ__
MotherboardIntel DH55PJ  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 5 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110120
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 10:13
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
XU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Memory 36.4
1-Core 36.7
2-Core 35.3
24% 36.1 Pts
4-Core 40.4
8-Core 54.2
6% 47.3 Pts
64-Core 55
3% 55 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 2400-PRO
Dell(1028 0402) 256MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.1100
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
0.56% Terrible
Lighting 0.63
Reflection 1.12
Parallax 0.41
0% 0.72 fps
MRender 0.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1.17
1% 0.76 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.56%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62
Write 59
Mixed 25
36% 48.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 M378B2873EH1-CH9 5GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 7.2
15% 5.3 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.4
SC Mixed 2.5
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DH55PJ Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel DH55PJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback