HP Z420 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z420 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1589
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140325
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateOct 26 '19 at 10:59
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1603 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 72.1
1-Core 72.9
2-Core 146
57% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 119
29% 191 Pts
64-Core 262
16% 262 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 310
HP(103C 094E) 512MB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 392.37
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 1% Great: 1%
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Dell(1028 2120) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.37% Terrible
Lighting 1.57
Reflection 1.54
Parallax 1.91
1% 1.67 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 2.13
2% 1.88 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.37%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 120GB-$60
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 63 73 57 33 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 438
Write 132
Mixed 194
SusWrite 59.8
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 33.6
4K Mixed 21
72% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 139
123% 192 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 76%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38
25GB free
Firmware: 3BKT
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 48 48 47 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
28.5% Poor
Read 50.7
Write 58.2
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 48.3
36% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 42%
Seagate Desktop 1TB
74GB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 26 25 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
14.5% Very poor
Read 27.3
Write 24.2
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 25.1
33% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.5%
Great: 21%
StoreJet Transcend 250GB
2GB free, PID 2335
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 25 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.6% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 24
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 25.9
33% 25 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CH9 Samsung M391B1G73BH0-CK0 9JSF51272AZ-1G9E2 24GB
1866, 1333, 1600, 1866 MHz
4096, 8192, 8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20.1
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18.3
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 8.5
27% 9.57 GB/s
Latency 96.6
41% 96.6 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z420 Workstation Builds (Compare 5,762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z420 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $153
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback