Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive44.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S6  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2799
Memory21.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '19 at 17:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5603
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 74.7
1-Core 40
2-Core 79.9
43% 64.9 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 322
28% 242 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI RAID SAS 6G 0/1 119GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 54 54 54 46 54 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
Read 370
Write 281
Mixed 279
SusWrite 89.1
57% 255 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 32.9
4K Mixed 14
57% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 131
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 76.7
82% 134 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%
LSI RAID SAS 6G 0/1 600GB
558GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 189 189 190 190 191 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 187
Mixed 89.4
SusWrite 190
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.6
297% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 108%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 91.1
44% 91.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX200 S6 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX200 S6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback