Today's hottest deals

Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180115
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 10:36
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 135
54% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 470
45% 369 Pts
64-Core 730
45% 730 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
22% Poor
Lighting 24.8
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 22.4
20% 25.3 fps
MRender 35.5
Gravity 24.8
Splatting 32.4
25% 30.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 22%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB (2017)-$154
223GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 284 195 244 145 197 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 908
Write 764
Mixed 437
SusWrite 231
130% 585 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 76.3
4K Mixed 41.7
148% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 516
DQ Mixed 410
348% 509 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 121%
Great: 155%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
796GB free
Firmware: P1225C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 62 48 58 86 79 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 464
Write 101
Mixed 76.8
SusWrite 73.1
38% 179 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 25.3
75% 25.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 186
137% 181 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 105%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 50.0AB50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 117 115 117 117 116 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 114
Write 110
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 116
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 67%
ST320005 42AS 2TB
2TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 36 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 39
Write 40.8
Mixed 27
SusWrite 35
48% 35.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 19%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.6 4.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Read 35.8
Write 39.5
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 4.4
35% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 21%
TOSHIBA HDWE140 4TB
3TB free, PID 2339
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0.1 0.1 0 0.1 0.2 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14% Very poor
Read 39.7
Write 39.5
Mixed 35
SusWrite 0.1
37% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
132% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 26.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $712
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback